From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sikorski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-02624.

January 22, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Isaac Anderson, Jr., Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Michael J.P. Baker, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Anthony Sikorski challenges his adjudication for direct criminal contempt. He contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court did not follow the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. The trial court failed to provide a written judgment of guilt reciting the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based as required by rule 3.830. See Spivey v. State, 616 So.2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Therefore, we reverse Sikorski's direct criminal contempt order and remand the case with directions that the trial court render a judgment in compliance with rule 3.830.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Sikorski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Sikorski v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SIKORSKI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 22, 1997

Citations

687 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)