Opinion
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01833-OES.
November 1, 2005
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AND DRAWING THE CASE TO A DISTRICT JUDGE AND TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on Applicant's "Motion for Expenses . . ." and for his "Motion for Time to Extend. . . ." Both of the Motions will be denied. For the most part, the substance of each Motion is simply a redundant statement of Applicant's claims. Furthermore, to the extent Applicant requests an extension of time or compensation for expenses, the Court finds no basis for granting an extension to file an appeal or for compensating Applicant for any expenses he has incurred.
The Court also will direct Applicant to refrain from filing any additional documents that simply are restatement of his claims. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Applicant's "Motion for Expenses . . .," filed September 21, 2005, and his "Motion for Time to Extend . . .," also filed September 21, 2005, are DENIED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant shall refrain from filing any additional documents that simply are restatements of his claims. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Application and the pending four Motions regarding a stay of deportation shall be drawn to a district judge and a magistrate judge.