From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siguenza v. Uribe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 10, 2022
CV 11-8020-RGK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022)

Opinion

CV 11-8020-RGK (AGR)

03-10-2022

MARLON EDGARDO SIGUENZA, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE JR., Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No. objections to the Report have been filed. Petitioner seeks to add a new claim that is unexhausted and not cognizable. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

The action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Siguenza v. Uribe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 10, 2022
CV 11-8020-RGK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Siguenza v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:MARLON EDGARDO SIGUENZA, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE JR., Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 10, 2022

Citations

CV 11-8020-RGK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022)