From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Signer v. Odell

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 1965
176 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1965)

Opinion

No. 34008.

June 9, 1965.

Writ of Certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Garland M. Budd, Miami, for petitioners.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for respondents.


Initial inspection suggested that the decision under review, Odell et al. v. Signer et al., 169 So.2d 851, was prima facie in conflict with prior decisions of this Court and another District Court. We granted certiorari to hear arguments on both jurisdiction and merits

After oral arguments and a careful further study of the record and briefs we have decided that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. We therefore conclude that the writ was improvidently issued and it must be discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

DREW, C.J., dissents with opinion.


I think we have jurisdiction and that the decision of the District Court is erroneous.


Summaries of

Signer v. Odell

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 1965
176 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1965)
Case details for

Signer v. Odell

Case Details

Full title:BURTON R. SIGNER AND DAVID MARKS, PETITIONERS, v. SAMUEL ODELL AND DAVID…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 9, 1965

Citations

176 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1965)

Citing Cases

Uible v. Landstreet

The argument that the execution of a promissory note by Landstreet's group and its delivery in Florida where…

Rollins Nursing Home, Inc. v. M & LC/Stillwell Mortgage Co.

The argument that the execution of a promissory note by Landstreet's group and its delivery in Florida where…