From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Signature Auto Grp. v. Rev Recreation Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 11, 2022
2-21-cv-01996-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2-21-cv-01996-JCM-DJA

01-11-2022

SIGNATURE AUTO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. REV RECREATION GROUP, INC. dba MIDWEST AUTOMOTIVE DESIGNS, a company incorporated in the state of Delaware; and DOES 1-X and ROES 1-X, Defendant.

FISHERBROYLES, LLP, Rob L. Phillips, Attorneys for Plaintiff W&D LAW, LLP, John T. Wendland, Attorneys for Defendant


FISHERBROYLES, LLP, Rob L. Phillips, Attorneys for Plaintiff

W&D LAW, LLP, John T. Wendland, Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Signature Auto Group, Inc. and Defendant Rev Recreation Group, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree to an extension of Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 5), up to and including February 11, 2022. In support of this motion, the parties state the following:

1. Plaintiff filed its Complaint on November 2, 2021, alleging claims for federal trademark infringement, federal unfair competition, deceptive trade practices, and common law trademark infringement and unfair competition, but Plaintiff did not serve the Complaint on Defendant. (See Dkt. 1.)

2. On December 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint to correctly identify the Defendant. (See Dkt. 5.) Plaintiff served the First Amended Complaint on Defendant on December 21, 2021.

3. On January 3, 2022, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff and requested a 30-day extension of time in which to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint, up to and including February 11, 2022, which Plaintiff agreed to.

4. The requested extension will permit Defendant's counsel the opportunity to assess the claims presented in the First Amended Complaint and defenses. The extension is not intended to, and will not, delay the action or cause prejudice to any party.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant respectfully request that the Court grant this motion, extending the time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint up to and including February 11, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Signature Auto Grp. v. Rev Recreation Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 11, 2022
2-21-cv-01996-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Signature Auto Grp. v. Rev Recreation Grp.

Case Details

Full title:SIGNATURE AUTO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. REV RECREATION GROUP, INC. dba…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 11, 2022

Citations

2-21-cv-01996-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)