From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sierrra-Garcia v. State

New York State Court of Claims
May 2, 2016
# 2016-041-024 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. May. 2, 2016)

Opinion

# 2016-041-024 Claim No. 121658 Motion No. M-88181

05-02-2016

HECTOR SIERRRA-GARCIA and HECTOR SIERRA-PAGAN (SIR) v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

HECTOR SIERRA-GARCIA Pro Se HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General By: Paul F. Cagino, Esq. Assistant Attorney General


Synopsis

Defendant's motion to dismiss claim as jurisdictionally defective due to claim not having been served on the Attorney General is granted.

Case information

UID:

2016-041-024

Claimant(s):

HECTOR SIERRRA-GARCIA and HECTOR SIERRA-PAGAN (SIR)

Claimant short name:

SIERRA-GARCIA

Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):

THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Footnote (defendant name) :

The caption is amended to state the proper defendant.

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):

121658

Motion number(s):

M-88181

Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:

FRANK P. MILANO

Claimant's attorney:

HECTOR SIERRA-GARCIA Pro Se

Defendant's attorney:

HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General By: Paul F. Cagino, Esq. Assistant Attorney General

Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:

May 2, 2016

City:

Albany

Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)

Decision

Defendant moves to dismiss this bailment claim for lack of jurisdiction because the claim (filed with the Clerk of the Court of Claims on August 22, 2012) was never served on the Attorney General. Claimants oppose the defendant's motion to dismiss the claim.

Defendant provides an affidavit of a Senior Clerk in the Office of the Attorney General stating that the Attorney General was never served with the claim.

Court of Claims Act section 10 requires that a claim to recover damages caused by the tortious conduct, whether intentional or unintentional, of an officer or employee of the state, be filed with the Clerk of the Court of Claims and served upon the Attorney General within ninety days after the accrual of the claim unless a notice of intention to file a claim is served within such ninety days, "in which event the claim shall be filed . . . within two years after the accrual of such claim."

Courts have consistently held that "[a]s a condition of the State's limited waiver of sovereign immunity, those requirements [timely filing and service] are strictly construed and a failure to comply therewith is a jurisdictional defect compelling the dismissal of the claim" (Welch v State of New York, 286 AD2d 496, 497-498 [2d Dept 2001]; see Robinson v State of New York, 38 AD3d 1030 [3d Dept 2007]; Pizarro v State of New York, 19 AD3d 891, 892 [3d Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 717 [2005]).

The affidavit in opposition of claimant Hector Sierra-Garcia states that he "served a Notice of intend and Claim to the Clerk Chief of the Court of Claims." Claimant Hector Sierra-Garcia does not state that he ever served a notice of intention to file a claim, or a claim, on the Attorney General.

The defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. The claim is dismissed.

May 2, 2016

Albany, New York

FRANK P. MILANO

Judge of the Court of Claims

Papers Considered:

1. Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss, filed February 11, 2016; 2. Affirmation of Paul F. Cagino, dated February 11, 2016, and attached exhibit, the affidavit of Janet Barringer, sworn to February 10, 2016; 3. Affidavit of Hector Sierra-Garcia, sworn to February 21, 2016.


Summaries of

Sierrra-Garcia v. State

New York State Court of Claims
May 2, 2016
# 2016-041-024 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. May. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Sierrra-Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:HECTOR SIERRRA-GARCIA and HECTOR SIERRA-PAGAN (SIR) v. THE STATE OF NEW…

Court:New York State Court of Claims

Date published: May 2, 2016

Citations

# 2016-041-024 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. May. 2, 2016)