Opinion
1645
September 25, 2003.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne Renwick, J.), entered November 29, 2002, which denied the motion of defendant C.C. Controlled Combustion Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the claims asserted against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Stephen C. Glasser, for plaintiffs-respondents.
Jonathan T. Uejio, for defendant-appellant.
Joseph T. Gibbons, for defendants-respondents.
Before: Saxe, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.
The court properly denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment based on the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (Workers' Compensation Law § 11 and § 29) since conflicting deposition testimony raises factual issues as to whether defendant-appellant exerted complete and exclusive control over plaintiff's work so as to render it plaintiff's special employer (see Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553, 557; Sween v. Spacemaster Bldg. Sys., LLC, 300 A.D.2d 32; Sanfilippo v. City of New York, 239 A.D.2d 296).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.