From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sierra Bay Contractors, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 10, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04611-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04611-RS

10-10-2011

SIERRA BAY CONTRACTORS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia Corporation, and ROES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL F. BARNUM Samuel F. Barnum Counsel for Third-Party Defendant ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY MORALES FIERRO & REEVES, LLP, David A Astengo Counsel for Third-Party Defendant WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY


RAMIRO MORALES, Bar # 167947

rmorales@mfrlegaI.corn

DAVID A. ASTENGO, Bar # 196096

dastengo@mfrlegal.com

MORALES FIERRO & REEVES

2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Suite 310

Pleasant Hill, California 94523

Telephone: (925)288-1776

Facsimile: (925)288-1856

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THIRD

PARTY DEFENDANT ASPEN SPECIALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41, Third-Party Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company ("Aspen") and Third-Party Claimant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company ("Westchester") have agreed and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of Aspen from this action, without prejudice, subject to said parties' mutual waiver of costs. Said parties request the Court's approval and execution of the below proposed order for dismissal.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL F. BARNUM

By: Samuel F. Barnum

Counsel for Third-Party Defendant

ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

MORALES FIERRO & REEVES, LLP,

By: David A Astengo

Counsel for Third-Party Defendant

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES

INSURANCE COMPANY

[PROPOSEDl ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Having reviewed the above stipulation, the Court orders that Third-Party Claimant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company's claims against Third-Party Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company be dismissed, without prejudice. The remainder of the third-party complaint shall not be changed or impacted by this Order.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

United States District Court

District of Northern California


Summaries of

Sierra Bay Contractors, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 10, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04611-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Sierra Bay Contractors, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SIERRA BAY CONTRACTORS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 10, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04611-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2011)