Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

2 Citing cases

  1. Chand v. Alta Cal. Reg'l Ctr.

    2:23-cv-1583 DC SCR (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024)

    The Court is persuaded that ACRC's Board cannot be sued as an entity separate from ACRC. See Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., No. 2020-1435, 2021 WL 3046590, at *10 (Fed. Cir. July 20, 2021) (“[U]nder California law, a plaintiff may not sue a corporation's board of directors as an entity separate from the corporation.”)

  2. Health Freedom Def. Fund v. U.S. Freedom Flyers, Inc.

    4:23-cv-00380-AKB (D. Idaho Dec. 29, 2023)

    The filing of an answer, however, may be construed as a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court will so construe in this case. See Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., No. 2020-1435, 2021 WL 3046590, at *12 (Fed. Cir. July 20, 2021); Davies, No. 91-15065, 1992 WL 317249, at *1; Hughes v. Port of Seattle, Nos. 87-3627, 87-3650, 1988 WL 60164, at *3 (9th Cir. June 3, 1988); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 (providing rules should be employed by the court “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding”). Additionally, Defendant Sarkisian, while still proceeding pro se, filed a motion to set aside default with the state court (Dkt. 1 at Ex. GG), and Defendant Harris, while also still proceeding pro se, filed a motion to dismiss with the state court (Dkt. 1 at Ex. DD), which Plaintiff construed as a motion to set aside the entry of default (Dkt. 1 at Ex. KK).