Opinion
May 11, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J., Le Vine, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Our review of the record indicates that the verdict was supported by the weight of the evidence.
We note that the defendant G.M. Proulx, the vice-president of F.H., was a proper party to interpose a counterclaim against the plaintiff, the president of F.H., to compel the plaintiff to return $6,000 to the corporate treasury and files belonging to F.H. to the corporate offices (see, Business Corporation Law § 720 [a] [1] [A], [B]; [b]).
Further, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that she suffered any prejudice as a result of the denial of her motion to strike the case from the calendar. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.