From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. Protiva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 11, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J., Le Vine, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Our review of the record indicates that the verdict was supported by the weight of the evidence.

We note that the defendant G.M. Proulx, the vice-president of F.H., was a proper party to interpose a counterclaim against the plaintiff, the president of F.H., to compel the plaintiff to return $6,000 to the corporate treasury and files belonging to F.H. to the corporate offices (see, Business Corporation Law § 720 [a] [1] [A], [B]; [b]).

Further, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that she suffered any prejudice as a result of the denial of her motion to strike the case from the calendar. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Siegel v. Protiva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Siegel v. Protiva

Case Details

Full title:JEAN SIEGEL, Appellant, v. MICHAEL PROTIVA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

L.W. Kent and Company, Inc. v. Wolf

The court's reliance on Di Dominici v Parmet ( 118 A.D.2d 618, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 601) is misplaced and,…

Bouhayer v. Georgalis

Under the statute, an officer or director may bring an action, individually, on behalf of the corporation,…