From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. Crescent

U.S.
Oct 4, 2004
543 U.S. 803 (2004)

Opinion

No. 04-5104.

October 4, 2004.


Certiorari Dismissed.

C.A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Siegel v. Crescent

U.S.
Oct 4, 2004
543 U.S. 803 (2004)
Case details for

Siegel v. Crescent

Case Details

Full title:SIEGEL v. CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 2004

Citations

543 U.S. 803 (2004)
125 S. Ct. 154