From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SIEGEL v. BUCA RESTAURANTS 2, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 12, 2010
No. 10 C 3739 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

No. 10 C 3739.

August 12, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Buca Restaurants 2, Inc. ("Buca") has filed its Answer to the Family Medical Leave Act Complaint brought against it by its ex-employee Sara Siegel ("Siegel"). This memorandum order is issued sua sponte because of one minor glitch in that responsive pleading.

Buca's counsel is not among the group of lawyers (unfortunately all too many) who ignore the clear roadmap marked out by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(b)(5) as the route to obtaining the benefit of a deemed denial of a plaintiff's allegations — indeed, counsel has followed that path faithfully in all but one instance. But because Answer ¶ 15 has deviated from that path, it is stricken, with leave of course being granted to file an amended Answer ¶ 15 (not a full-blown Amended Answer, which would be unnecessarily burdensome) on or before August 20, 2010.


Summaries of

SIEGEL v. BUCA RESTAURANTS 2, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 12, 2010
No. 10 C 3739 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

SIEGEL v. BUCA RESTAURANTS 2, INC.

Case Details

Full title:SARA A. SIEGEL, Plaintiff, v. BUCA RESTAURANTS 2, INC., etc., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

No. 10 C 3739 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2010)