From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827

10-18-2011

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al. Defendants.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL JACOB R. SORENSEN FUSAE NARA ANDREW D. LANPHERE By: Jacob R. Sorensen Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION WHITE & CASE LLP CHRISTOPHER M. CURRAN KRISTEN J. MCAHREN By: Kristen J. McAhren Attorneys for Defendants TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP ROBERT D. WICK DEREK LUDWIN THEODORE P. METZLER By: Theodore P. Metzler Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. PERKINS COIE LLP DAVID J. BURMAN CORI G. MOORE By: Cori G. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION


PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA State Bar No. 88500)

JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA State Bar No. 209134)

FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)

ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA State Bar No. 191479)

Attorneys for Defendants

SHARP CORPORATION and

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CLAIMS

AGAINST SAMSUNG, SHARP, AND TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation ("Costco") and Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; and Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Mobile Display Co. (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS on September 9, 2011 the Court issued an order compelling arbitration of Costco's claims against Stipulating Defendants;

WHEREAS on September 29, 2011 Costco filed an Amended Complaint, naming Stipulating Defendants among the defendants;

WHEREAS on October 11, 2011, Costco filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association, naming as respondents the Stipulating Defendants;

NOW, THEREFORE, Costco and the Stipulating Defendants, through their undersigned respective counsel, stipulate and request that the Court order as follows:

1. Costco's claims against the Stipulating Defendants are stayed pending the completion of the arbitration, pursuant to section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3;

2. The Stipulating Defendants need not respond to Costco's Amended Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

JOHN M. GRENFELL

JACOB R. SORENSEN

FUSAE NARA

ANDREW D. LANPHERE

By: Jacob R. Sorensen

Attorneys for Defendants SHARP

CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS

CORPORATION

WHITE & CASE LLP

CHRISTOPHER M. CURRAN

KRISTEN J. MCAHREN

By: Kristen J. McAhren

Attorneys for Defendants TOSHIBA

CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA

ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.,

TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION

SYSTEMS, INC., and TOSHIBA MOBILE

DISPLAY CO.

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

ROBERT D. WICK

DEREK LUDWIN

THEODORE P. METZLER

By: Theodore P. Metzler

Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

PERKINS COIE LLP

DAVID J. BURMAN

CORI G. MOORE

By: Cori G. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION

SO ORDERED:

The Honorable Susan Illston

District Court Judge
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above-named parties.


Summaries of

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)