From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 10-cv-5625 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-cv-5625 SI Master File No. 07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 SI

10-18-2011

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC; CHI MEI CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO JAPAN CO. LTD.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.; CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.; TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; LG DISPLAY CO. LTD.; LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.; AND HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., Defendants.

CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (CA SBN 81297) CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (CA SBN 124158) PATRICK J. RICHARD (CA SBN 131046) SALEZKA L. AGUIRRE (CA SBN 260956) NOSSAMAN LLP Attorneys for defendants AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA


CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (CA SBN 81297)

CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (CA SBN 124158)

PATRICK J. RICHARD (CA SBN 131046)

SALEZKA L. AGUIRRE (CA SBN 260956)

NOSSAMAN LLP

Attorneys for defendants AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION

and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust ("Circuit City Trust"), filed a Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case against defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co. Ltd., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., Nexgen Mediated, Inc., Nexgen Mediated USA, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., HannStar Display Corporation, LG Display Co. Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (collectively "Defendants") on July 7, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Circuit City Trust's Second Amended Complaint on August 8, 2011;

WHEREAS the Court denied Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on September 15, 2011;

WHEREAS the Court approved a stipulation between the Circuit City Trust and certain defendants, including AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America ("AUO"), extending those defendants' time to answer the Second Amended Complaint from September 29, 2011 until October 17, 2011.

WHEREAS AUO requires additional time to respond to Circuit City Trust's Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS Circuit City Trust and AUO have now agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that AUO shall have up to and including October 31, 2011 to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, pending approval of the Court;

WHEREAS this extension will not alter the date of any other event or any other deadline already fixed by the Court;

THEREFORE, Circuit City Trust and AUO hereby agree that AUO shall have up to and including October 31, 2011 to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Respectfully submitted,

By: Parker C. Folse, III

Susman Godfrey, L.L.P.

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800

Seattle, WA 98101

Tel: (206) 516-3860

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS

TRUSTEE OF THE CIRCUIT CITY STORES,

INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST

By: s/Christopher A. Nedeau

Christopher A. Nedeau (Bar No. 81297)

50 California Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Tel: (415) 398-3600

Fax: (415) 398-2438

Attorneys for Defendants

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU

OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatory thereto has been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Honorable Susan Illston


Summaries of

Siegel v. AU Optronics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 10-cv-5625 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Siegel v. AU Optronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. LIQUIDATING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10-cv-5625 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)