From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel Equities v. Farries

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1946
187 Misc. 263 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

May 28, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GOODMAN, J.

Nathan Finkelstein and Alexander R. Nelson for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The landlord's failure to paint tenant's apartment, thereby breaching the alleged agreement to do so is no defense to the proceeding for nonpayment of the due rent ( Douglas v. Chesebrough Building Co., 56 A.D. 403; 1225 Fulton Avenue Corporation v. Carbonell, 24 N.Y.S.2d 749).

The final order should be modified by striking therefrom the provisions qualifying the landlord's right to withdraw the money deposited in the court below to the credit of the landlord, and as modified affirmed without prejudice to any claim the tenant may have against the landlord for breach of alleged agreement to paint her apartment.

SHIENTAG, McLAUGHLIN and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Siegel Equities v. Farries

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1946
187 Misc. 263 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Siegel Equities v. Farries

Case Details

Full title:SIEGEL EQUITIES, INC., Landlord, Appellant, v. "JOHN" FARRIES, Tenant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 28, 1946

Citations

187 Misc. 263 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
63 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Matter of Astor

It would, however, be wholly anomalous to allow the tenant to remain in possession until the determination of…