Siefert v. Howard

Full title: JACK R. SIEFERT, Plaintiff, v. JEAN HOWARD, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

CV F 05 0430 OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2005)

Opinion

CV F 05 0430 OWW WMW P.

October 11, 2005

ORDER RE: FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS (#12)

OLIVER WANGER, District Judge

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 30, 2005, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 30, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.