From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siebert v. Chandler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-825-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-825-O

02-28-2014

ANDREW SIEBERT, Petitioner, v. RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI-Fort Worth, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In this action brought by petitioner Andrew Siebert under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;
2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on February 6, 2014; and
3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on February 26, 2014.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner's objections are overruled, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be denied, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that Andrew Siebert's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED.

_________________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Siebert v. Chandler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-825-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Siebert v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW SIEBERT, Petitioner, v. RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI-Fort Worth…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Feb 28, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-825-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2014)