From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sidote v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 7, 1926
15 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 4676.

December 7, 1926.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

Henry A. Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio (Mooney, McCormack, Roth Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John B. Osmun, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio (A.E. Bernsteen, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for the United States.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.


Affirmed. The counts for possession and sale were supported by substantial evidence; and the single sentence was permissible under these counts without reference to the nuisance count.


Summaries of

Sidote v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 7, 1926
15 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Sidote v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Charles SIDOTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 7, 1926

Citations

15 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1926)