From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sidener v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2014
No. 64092 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2014)

Opinion

No. 64092

02-13-2014

SCOTT WILLIAM SIDENER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of manufacture or possession by a prisoner of an item or items adapted, designed, or commonly used to escape. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Appellant Scott William Sidener alleges that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a term of imprisonment consecutive to the sentence imposed in district court case no. CR13-6223 and by denying his request for probation because he is 21 years old and has only had two prior felony convictions. We disagree.

"The sentencing judge has wide discretion in imposing a sentence." Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). This court will refrain from interfering with the sentence imposed "[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence." Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976). Sidener committed the instant offense while in custody for a previous felony offense, his prison term of 15 to 38 months is within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 212.093(2)(a), and he does not allege that the district court relied on impalpable or highly suspect evidence. Further, the district court was prohibited from granting probation. NRS 212.093(3)(a); NRS 176A.100(1)(a), (c) (probation may be granted except where "expressly forbidden"). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by running Sidener's sentence consecutive to another sentence. See NRS 176.035(1) (decision to impose consecutive sentence is discretionary); Warden v. Peters, 83 Nev. 298, 303, 429 P.2d 549, 552 (1967). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. __________, J.
Pickering
__________, J.
Parraguirre
__________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Humboldt County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk


Summaries of

Sidener v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2014
No. 64092 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Sidener v. State

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT WILLIAM SIDENER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2014

Citations

No. 64092 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2014)