From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sickman v. Standard Ins. Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2023
No. 22-3009 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2023)

Opinion

22-3009

02-14-2023

MARGARET SICKMAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. CIVIL ACTION


ORDER

Juan R. Sanchez, C.J.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2023, upon consideration of Defendants Flowers Foods/Tasty Baking Company and Standard Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) and Plaintiff Margaret Sickman's opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED Sickman's request for leave to amend her complaint is DENIED. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. See Weathers v. Sch. Dist. of Phila., 383 F.Supp.3d 388, 402 n.11 (E.D. Pa. 2019) (citing Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 108 (3d Cir. 2002)) (“This Court may dismiss a claim with prejudice when leave to amend would be futile.”).

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT


Summaries of

Sickman v. Standard Ins. Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2023
No. 22-3009 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Sickman v. Standard Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET SICKMAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. CIVIL ACTION

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 14, 2023

Citations

No. 22-3009 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2023)