Sickley Brothers v. Michel Moore Company

Full title: SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1932

162 A. 582 (N.J. 1932)

109 N.J.L. 348

Opinion

Submitted May 27, 1932 —

Decided October 17, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 606.

For the respondent, Riker Riker.

For the appellant, Jacob E. Max.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.