From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sichanthavong v. Whitfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION
Jun 30, 2021
2:20-CV-53-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-53-Z-BR

06-30-2021

VICKER SICHANTHAVONG, Plaintiff, v. DEIDRA WHITFIELD, Defendant.


ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 3, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint. (ECF No. 16). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the undersigned United States District Judge dismiss with prejudice Plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with the Court's oifders. (Id. at 1). The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the undersigned deny Plaintiffs "Motion for Default Judgement" (ECF No. 11), "Motion for Double Default Judgment" (ECF Nd. 14), and "Motion for Criminal and Civil Judgment" (ECF No. 15).

Plaintiff filed a "Return of Summon" (ECF No. 17) on June 10, 2021 and an "Objection to the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation" (ECF No. 18) on June 16, 2021. The "Return of Summon" appears to be a copy of the tracking information for the summons, which appears to have been sent by certified mail to Defendant Deidra Whitfield earlier this year. (ECF No. 17 at 1-3). However, this document does not indicate that service of the Complaint was properly completed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See id.). The "Objection" only states: "Under ECF user Manual Rule 1 of 2012 Pro se filer may, but does not have to, utilize the ECF system." (ECF 18 at 1).

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case and the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

The Court hereby OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections and ORDERS that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs "Motion for Default Judgement" (ECF No. 11), "Motion for Double Default Judgment" (ECF No. 14), and "Motion for Criminal and Civil Judgment" (ECF No. 15) are DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sichanthavong v. Whitfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION
Jun 30, 2021
2:20-CV-53-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Sichanthavong v. Whitfield

Case Details

Full title:VICKER SICHANTHAVONG, Plaintiff, v. DEIDRA WHITFIELD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-53-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 30, 2021)