From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shurney v. Dodson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 14, 2024
CV 23-8247-TJH(SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-8247-TJH(SHKx)

02-14-2024

Allure Shurney, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Commissioner William D. Dodson et al., Defendants/Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND

The Court previously received from [X] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):

[ ] an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal.

[X] Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request or payment of the tiling fees.

[ ] Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the full fee.

The Court sent a warning letter to [X] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected.

Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED

[X] DISMISSED without prejudice.

[ ] REMANDED to the___ .


Summaries of

Shurney v. Dodson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 14, 2024
CV 23-8247-TJH(SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Shurney v. Dodson

Case Details

Full title:Allure Shurney, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Commissioner William D. Dodson…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 14, 2024

Citations

CV 23-8247-TJH(SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)