From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shuniak v. AAA Well Drilling & Boring Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 14, 1978
247 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

56227.

SUBMITTED JUNE 29, 1978.

DECIDED JULY 14, 1978.

Action for refund. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Wright.

Bates, Baum Landey, Stanley M. Baum, for appellant.

Rhymer Brock, William Rhymer, for appellee.


Appellant, characterizing his suit as one for breach of warranty, contends that, because he had introduced evidence indicating there were defects in a well drilling machine he bought from appellee and because he had introduced evidence indicating those defects constituted a warranty breach, the trial court erred in directing a verdict against him. We disagree with appellant's contention and affirm the trial court, as appellant failed to produce evidence to show damages in accordance with UCC § 2-714 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 156, 230) (Code Ann. § 109A-2-714). Carr v. Jacuzzi Bros., 133 Ga. App. 70 ( 210 S.E.2d 16) (1974).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 29, 1978 — DECIDED JULY 14, 1978.


Summaries of

Shuniak v. AAA Well Drilling & Boring Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 14, 1978
247 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Shuniak v. AAA Well Drilling & Boring Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHUNIAK v. AAA WELL DRILLING BORING COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 14, 1978

Citations

247 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
247 S.E.2d 601