From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shumack v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jan 11, 2001
Civil Action 00-0517-CB-M (S.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2001)

Opinion

Civil Action 00-0517-CB-M

January 11, 2001


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying claimant benefits be reversed and this cause remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) for further proceedings.

The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the Plaintiff a prevailing party under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that this action be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Social Security Administration further administrative proceedings.


Summaries of

Shumack v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jan 11, 2001
Civil Action 00-0517-CB-M (S.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2001)
Case details for

Shumack v. Apfel

Case Details

Full title:WANDRA SHUMACK, plaintiff, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 11, 2001

Citations

Civil Action 00-0517-CB-M (S.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2001)