Opinion
December, 1904.
Order reversed on argument, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs, on the ground that the moving papers disclose no facts authorizing the appointment of a receiver. All concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Shultz v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1904
99 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
Summaries of
Shultz v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1904
99 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
Case details for
Shultz v. Kelly
Case Details
Full title:Harry L. Shultz, Appellant, v. Catherine T. Kelly and Others, Respondents
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1904
Citations
99 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
91 N.Y.S. 1113