From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shuler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 2006
929 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D05-2161.

May 15, 2006.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County, James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Edgar Lee Elzie, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


The appellant challenges his convictions for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and driving while license suspended or revoked. Although his other arguments lack merit, the appellant correctly argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a severance of the charges. See Tucker v. State, 884 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); State v. Vazquez, 419 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 1982). The appellant's conviction for driving while license suspended or revoked is therefore reversed and the case is remanded on that count. The conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not affected by the trial court's error and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shuler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 2006
929 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Shuler v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie E. SHULER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 15, 2006

Citations

929 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

McGriff v. State

Accordingly, the trial court should have severed count II from the remaining charges for purposes of trial.…

McGriff v. State

Accordingly, the trial court should have severed count II from the remaining charges for purposes of trial.…