Shukla v. State

Full title: Sanket Shukla v. The State of Texas

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: May 10, 2018

Cause number: 01-18-00147-CR (Tex. App. May. 10, 2018)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-18-00147-CR

05-10-2018

Sanket Shukla v. The State of Texas

Laura C. Higley

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Notice of Appearance and Designation of New Lead Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant's Newly-Retained Counsel, Peyton Z. Peebles II and Appointed Counsel, Hattie Sewell Shannon Document to be filed: N/A Is appeal accelerated? No. Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted
[ ] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
Appellant's notice of appearance and designation of new lead counsel, construed as a motion to substitute counsel, is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and was signed by both appointed and newly-retained counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). The Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Hattie Sewell Shannon as counsel for appellant and to substitute Peyton Z. Peebles II as appellant's lead counsel of record, if not done so already. See id. 6.1(c), 6.2.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: May 10, 2018 November 7, 2008 Revision