From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shroid Construction, Inc. v. Dattoma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 3, 2000.

December 6, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), entered May 26, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $105,297.

James W. Dougherty, Malverne, N.Y., and Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale, N.Y. (John M. Armentano and Timothy J. Hopkins of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Massoud Pashkoff, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Ahmed A. Massoud of counsel), for respondent.

Before: WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence the plaintiff' s summary charts, which were the plaintiff's Exhibits 2B through 4. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in basing its award upon those exhibits (see, Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. State of New York, 258 A.D.2d 431; see also, Suffolk County Bldrs. Assn. v. County of Suffolk, 46 N.Y.2d 613, 621; Berley Inds. v. City of New York, 45 N.Y.2d 683, 686).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Shroid Construction, Inc. v. Dattoma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Shroid Construction, Inc. v. Dattoma

Case Details

Full title:SHROID CONSTRUCTION, INC., RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH DATTOMA, ETC., APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 916