From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shriner v. Lehman

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. C03-5672 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. C03-5672 RBL.

February 21, 2006


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Petitioner's filing of a Notice of Appeal [Dkt. #24, entered January 30, 2006].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

Petitioner has filed a Notice of Appeal of this Court's Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #21] and Judgment [Dkt. #22, entered May 21, 2004], dismissing petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. In order for this appeal to proceed, this Court must first issue a Certificate of Appealability. See U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). In addition to the fact that this appeal does not appear to be timely, see Fed.R.App.P. 4, this Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the petitioner has failed to make "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.


Summaries of

Shriner v. Lehman

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. C03-5672 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Shriner v. Lehman

Case Details

Full title:EARL KENNETH SHRINER, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH LEHMAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. C03-5672 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2006)