From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoulders v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1763 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1763 MCE KJM P.

February 22, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (docket no. 13) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Shoulders v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1763 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Shoulders v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE JAMES SHOULDERS, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1763 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)