Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP

Full title: RICHARD SHOTELL et al., Plaintiffs, v. HODGSON RUSS LLP, Appellant, and…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 2005

21 A.D.3d 1407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7186

801 N.Y.S.2d 205

Opinion

CA 05-00811.

September 30, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendant Brody Weiss Zucarelli Urbanek CPA's, PC to compel the continued deposition of and answers to certain questions by a partner in defendant Hodgson Russ LLP.

HAGERTY BRADY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAECKLE, FLEISCHMANN MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (CHARLES C. SWANEKAMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Before: Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Presti v. Schalck, 26 AD2d 793).