Opinion
February, 1922.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Shostack v. Haskell, 116 Misc. Rep. 475.) Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
February, 1922.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Shostack v. Haskell, 116 Misc. Rep. 475.) Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Full title:NATHAN SHOSTACK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL HASKELL and Others, Defendants…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1922