From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Short v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2012
Case No. 09-12171 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 09-12171

10-04-2012

GERALD ALAN SHORT, Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.


Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

On September 27, 2012, the petitioner filed a motion for a certificate of appealability. On August 31, 2012, the Court entered an order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, overruling the petitioner's objections, and denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In the same order, the Court denied a certificate of appealability. The petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability is moot, as the Court has already denied the relief the petitioner seeks.

Further, the Court would deny the petitioner's motion even if it were construed as a motion for reconsideration. Motions for reconsideration may be granted pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(1) when the moving party shows (1) a "palpable defect," (2) that misled the court and the parties, and (3) that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). A "palpable defect" is a defect which is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Mich. Dep't of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (citations omitted). However, motions for reconsideration should not be granted when they "merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication." E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). The petitioner's motion raises only issues ruled on by the Court, both expressly and by reasonable implication.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability [dkt. #26] is DENIED.

____________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE


The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on October 4, 2012.


Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Short v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2012
Case No. 09-12171 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Short v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:GERALD ALAN SHORT, Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 09-12171 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2012)