From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Short v. Daniels

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv832-MHT (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv832-MHT

09-26-2012

ANGELO B. SHORT, Petitioner, v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Respondents.


(WO)


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is adopted.
(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Short v. Daniels

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv832-MHT (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Short v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO B. SHORT, Petitioner, v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv832-MHT (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)