Compare id. (finding a de minimis benefit, if any, conferred by a plaintiff bringing a liquor bottle to a party), and Puglisi v. McDannell, 1985 WL 189338, at *2 (Del. Super. Dec. 23, 1985) (finding no benefit conferred by a plaintiff who allowed a defendant to keep his plumber's vise in the plaintiff's garage), with Short-Karr v. RB Gyms, Inc., 2015 WL 7776734, at *3 (Del. Super. Nov. 20, 2015) (finding guest of gym member to be a business invitee when injured in the gym). 13. Plaintiff has not put forward evidence that would establish at trial a prima facie case that he was the Taylors' business invitee.

Id. Short-Karr v. RB Gyms, Inc., 2015 WL 7776734, at *3 (Del. Super. Nov. 20, 2015)(citations omitted). Id. (citing Davenport v. D & L Construction, LLC, 2015 WL 4885069, at *3 (Del. Super. Aug. 14, 2015)).

Second, Defendant argues that the provision Plaintiff cites applies to rental units, and the parking lot in question is neither a rental unit nor a rentable area. Defendant also argues that an expert is necessary in tort cases where proximate cause is presented in a context which is not a matter of common knowledge. Defendant cites Short-Karr v. RB Gyms, Inc., 2015 WL 7776734 (Del. Super. Nov. 20, 2015). Discussion