From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shorb v. Nooth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 2, 2017
2:14-CV-02005-SB (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)

Opinion

2:14-CV-02005-SB

02-02-2017

CHARLES RAY SHORB, Petitioner, v. MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation (#40) on December 30, 2016, in which she recommends the Court deny Petitioner Charles Ray Shorb's Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, enter a judgment dismissing the matter with prejudice, and grant a certificate of appealability. Petitioner filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

In his Objections Petitioner reiterates the arguments contained in his Petition and Brief in Support of Petition. This Court has carefully considered Petitioner's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation (#40) and, therefore, DENIES the Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and GRANTS a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shorb v. Nooth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 2, 2017
2:14-CV-02005-SB (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Shorb v. Nooth

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES RAY SHORB, Petitioner, v. MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

2:14-CV-02005-SB (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Shorb v. Josephine Cnty. Circuit Court

In 2008, Shorb was convicted of Rape in the First Degree and Sexual Abuse in the First Degree following a…

Glick v. Premo

Significantly, Petitioner does not allege he hired Mr. Roloff to prepare or file a federal habeas petition…