From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shopping Cen. v. Skilken

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 3, 1964
214 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 7537

Decided March 3, 1964.

Appeal — Declaring mistrial not final appealable order — Chapter 2505, Revised Code.

The declaring of a "mistrial" during the course of such trial is not a final order, judgment or decree which is appealable under the provisions of Chapter 2505 of the Revised Code.

APPEAL: Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

ON APPLICATION to dismiss.

Messrs. Topper Alloway and Mr. N. Victor Goodman, for appellee.

Messrs. Stotter Elden and Mr. Carl B. Mellman, for appellant.


The plaintiff, appellee herein, has filed an application to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the order of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County appealed from is not a final order within the meaning of Section 2505.02 of the Revised Code.

The entry appealed from declared a mistrial; granted the plaintiff leave to file a second amended petition and to bring in new parties plaintiff or defendant as the case may be.

Defendant, appellant herein, opposes the motion for a dismissal claiming the declaration of a mistrial is similar to the granting of a motion for a new trial and is appealable for an abuse of discretion. A new trial is a re-examination, in the same court, of the issues after a final order, judgment, or decree by the court. (Section 2321.17, Revised Code.) A mistrial is not a judgment or order in favor of one of the parties.

The court, before the trial was completed, concluded that a defect in the parties plaintiff prevented a proper judgment being rendered and declared a "mistrial." It did not render a final order, judgment, or decree which is appealable under the provisions of Chapter 2505 of the Revised Code.

The motion is well taken and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

BRYANT and TROOP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shopping Cen. v. Skilken

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 3, 1964
214 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Shopping Cen. v. Skilken

Case Details

Full title:NEWARK SHOPPING CENTER, INC., APPELLEE v. MORRIS SKILKEN CO., INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Mar 3, 1964

Citations

214 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964)
214 N.E.2d 674

Citing Cases

State v. Rudge

"Ordinarily declaration of a mistrial and continuing a case on the trial docket is not a final appealable…

Howard v. Kuehnert

Last, the order did not set aside a judgment, as no judgment has been rendered, and does not grant a new…