From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shootes v. Dray

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Feb 20, 2024
3:23-cv-840-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla. Feb. 20, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-840-TJC-MCR

02-20-2024

CHRISTOPHER SHOOTES, Plaintiff, v. J. AUSTIN DRAY, Attorney, BRIAN FEY, NICOLE BARKLEY, JUSTIN CLARK AND ASSOCIATES, RAMADA INN, GMC, and STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendants.


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation recommending dismissing the case without prejudice and directing the clerk to terminate any pending motions and close the file. Doc. 14. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Upon de novo review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Doc. 14, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 14, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the pending motions and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shootes v. Dray

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Feb 20, 2024
3:23-cv-840-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla. Feb. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Shootes v. Dray

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SHOOTES, Plaintiff, v. J. AUSTIN DRAY, Attorney, BRIAN FEY…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Feb 20, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-840-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla. Feb. 20, 2024)