From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoop v. Nev. Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 28, 2013
3:12-CV-00101-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-00101-RCJ-WGC

02-28-2013

DONALD SHOOP, Plaintiff, v. NV ENERGY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #4) entered on July 18, 2012, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court enter an order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #1) and Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #4).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #1) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28TH day of February, 2013

______________

ROBERT C. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shoop v. Nev. Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 28, 2013
3:12-CV-00101-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Shoop v. Nev. Energy

Case Details

Full title:DONALD SHOOP, Plaintiff, v. NV ENERGY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-00101-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2013)

Citing Cases

Clark v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Where income is roughly equal to expenses, courts have granted IFP pplications when the plaintiff's absolute…