Opinion
Argued February 3, 1888
Decided February 10, 1888
P.D. Niver for appellant.
J.H. Clute for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Shook v. City of Cohoes
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1888
15 N.E. 531 (N.Y. 1888)
Summaries of
Shook v. City of Cohoes
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1888
15 N.E. 531 (N.Y. 1888)
Case details for
Shook v. City of Cohoes
Case Details
Full title:CATHARINE SHOOK, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF COHOES, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 10, 1888
Citations
15 N.E. 531 (N.Y. 1888)
15 N.E. 531
13 N.Y. St. Rptr. 643
Citing Cases
Osier v. the Consumers' Company
The question is for the jury. ( Dundas v. City of Lansing, 75 Mich. 499, 13 Am. St. 457, 42 N.W. 1011, 5…
Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia" The case just referred to was approved and followed in Shook v. City of Cohoes, 108 N.Y. 648. And, also, in…