From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sholl v. Atchley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
2:21-cv-00064 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00064 KJM GGH P

09-08-2021

BRIAN M. SHOLL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed July 27, 2021, denying petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. ECF No. 14. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any new or different facts or circumstances which did not exist or were not shown upon the prior motion. See ED. Local Rule 230(j). Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 14) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sholl v. Atchley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
2:21-cv-00064 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Sholl v. Atchley

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. SHOLL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00064 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)