From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Sliger

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 8, 2016
207 So. 3d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D14–3871.

08-08-2016

James R. SHOEMAKER, D.O., and Ormond Medical, etc., Appellants, v. Sonia SLIGER, as Personal, etc., Appellee.

Dinah Stein, Mark Hicks, and Mary Gniadek, of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, for Appellants. David J. Sales, of David J. Sales, P.A., Jupiter, and Stephen Knox, of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


Dinah Stein, Mark Hicks, and Mary Gniadek, of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, for Appellants.

David J. Sales, of David J. Sales, P.A., Jupiter, and Stephen Knox, of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT

We grant Appellee's motion for certification and certify conflict between our decision issued on February 12, 2016, and Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ferayorni, 876 So.2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

CONFLICT CERTIFICATION GRANTED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS, JJ., and PLEUS, ROBERT J., JR., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Sliger

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 8, 2016
207 So. 3d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Sliger

Case Details

Full title:James R. SHOEMAKER, D.O., and Ormond Medical, etc., Appellants, v. Sonia…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 8, 2016

Citations

207 So. 3d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)