From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Miller

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
May 31, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-CV-51 HTW-RPM (S.D. Miss. May. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:20-CV-51 HTW-RPM

05-31-2022

RICKEY SHOEMAKER PLAINTIFF v. WARDEN JAMES MILLER DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HENRY T. WINGATE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Robert P. Meyers, Jr., [Docket no. 13], which was entered on April 25, 2022. Plaintiff did not file any objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

After examining the record evidence in this case, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Rickey Shoemaker's §2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied with prejudice.

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as well as the court filings and the relevant law, and concludes that the findings in the Report and Recommendation [doc. no. 13] should be and are hereby adopted as this Court's own. Accordingly, this court dismisses this Complaint. A separate Final Judgment will issue on this date.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Miller

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
May 31, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-CV-51 HTW-RPM (S.D. Miss. May. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY SHOEMAKER PLAINTIFF v. WARDEN JAMES MILLER DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:20-CV-51 HTW-RPM (S.D. Miss. May. 31, 2022)