Opinion
June, 1910.
Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P.J., Woodward, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Shoemaker v. Meyer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1910
139 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Shoemaker v. Meyer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1910
139 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Shoemaker v. Meyer
Case Details
Full title:Horatio Shoemaker, Respondent, v. Mary Meyer, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1910
Citations
139 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Citing Cases
Murphy v. Murphy
Sarah C. Murphy appealed. Error assigned was, inter alia, judgment, quoting it. James C. Crumlish, for…
Herman v. Haffenegger(Sargent v. Graham, 5 N.H. 440; Bakeman v. Pooler, 15 Wend. 639.) The party seeking to rescind must put the…