From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Dawson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-115 CW (D. Utah Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-115 CW

06-19-2012

PAUL DAVID SHOEMAKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLEN R. DAWSON et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION


District Judge Clark Waddoups


Magistrate Judge Samuel Alba

This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Samuel Alba under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 20, 2012, Judge Alba issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the four pending motions to dismiss be granted and that a motion filed by the plaintiffs' be denied. That motion is titled Motion and Application by Special Appearance and Special Deposit for Complaint for Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Re: Glen R. Dawson's Ruling 8 July 2011.

The plaintiffs filed no objection to the report and recommendation. With respect to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, both the Utah trial court case and the appellate case have been dismissed. See Shoemaker v. Shoemaker, 2011 UT App 391, 265 P.3d 850. Because the state proceedings have ended, application of the doctrine is appropriate in this case. See Erlandson v. Northglenn Mun. Ct., 528 F.3d 785, 786 (10th Cir. 2008) (stating the Rooker-Feldman doctrine "is confined to cases brought after the state proceedings have ended"). Under the Younger abstention doctrine, the court further concludes the State of Washington provides an appropriate forum to the extent there are any ongoing proceedings related to the divorce and child-custody matters at issue.

Accordingly, the court hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Alba's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Because the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case, it hereby dismisses the action. Each party shall bear one's own costs and fees.

Docket No. 21.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

Clark Waddoups

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Dawson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-115 CW (D. Utah Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:PAUL DAVID SHOEMAKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLEN R. DAWSON et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-115 CW (D. Utah Jun. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Talbot v. Utah

United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744, 766 (2013) (citation and quotations omitted). Julander v. Lee, 2018…

Motlagh v. Salt Lake City

Whitney v. New Mexico, 113 F.3d 1170, 1173-34 (10th Cir. 1997). Shoemaker v. Dawson, 2012 U.S Dist. LEXIS…