From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Cook

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 22, 2020
618 S.W.3d 640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108597

12-22-2020

Robert E. SHOEMAKER, Respondent, v. Amy S. SHOEMAKER COOK, Appellant.

Lawrence G. Gillespie, 120 South Central Ave, Suite 650, Clayton, Mo. 63105-1705, for appellant. Nathan Bollinger, P.O. Box 151, Fredericktown, Mo. 63645, for respondent.


Lawrence G. Gillespie, 120 South Central Ave, Suite 650, Clayton, Mo. 63105-1705, for appellant.

Nathan Bollinger, P.O. Box 151, Fredericktown, Mo. 63645, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J.; Kurt S. Odenwald, J.; and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Amy S. Shoemaker Cook appeals from the circuit court's judgment modifying a previous judgment dissolving her marriage to Robert E. Shoemaker. At issue is the circuit court's modification of the physical-custody schedule. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(1)&(5).


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Cook

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 22, 2020
618 S.W.3d 640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:Robert E. SHOEMAKER, Respondent, v. Amy S. SHOEMAKER COOK, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Dec 22, 2020

Citations

618 S.W.3d 640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)