From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2304 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2304

07-03-2018

DUSTIN SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2018, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 15) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court deny the appeal of Dustin Shoemaker ("Shoemaker") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and the court noting that Shoemaker filed objections (Doc. 16) to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), and the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") filed a response (Doc. 17) thereto, and following de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court being in agreement with Judge Carlson that the administrative law judge's decision "is supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001), and finding Judge Carlson's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and further finding Shoemaker's objections to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 15) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. The Commissioner's decision denying Shoemaker's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Shoemaker as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2304 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 3, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2304 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 3, 2018)

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Saul

Shoemaker v. Colvin, No. 3:16-CV-2304, 2018 WL 3245011, at *9 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2018), report and…

Spano v. Kijakazi

The courts have found there is “no inherent inconsistency between” finding that a claimant can “perform…