From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shoemaker v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-2714-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-2714-AP.

September 16, 2009


ORDER


On September 1, 2009, this court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Rather than respond to the Order to Show Cause, plaintiff wrote a letter that complained about her attorney, who was permitted to withdraw at the request of plaintiff. At that juncture, plaintiff was then personally responsible for proceeding with her case.

I will once more try to get this case on track. I will temporarily discharge the Order to Show Cause, and resend the instructions for preparation of the Joint Case Management Plan, with the hopes that plaintiff will review the documents and confer with counsel for the defendant and get the briefing of this matter underway. The Joint Case Management Plan shall be filed no later than October 7, 2009. Plaintiff is reminded that it is now her responsibility to comply with the orders of the court.


Summaries of

Shoemaker v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-2714-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Shoemaker v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KELLI L. SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 16, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-2714-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2009)