Opinion
2:18-cv-01948-TLN-KJN
06-15-2022
MANFRED SHOCKNER, Plaintiff, v. DR. SOLTANIAN, et al., Defendant.
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On April 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed objections to the order filed March 18, 2022 denying Plaintiff's requests for subpoenas. (ECF No. 130.) The Court construes Plaintiff's objections as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
In his request for reconsideration, Plaintiff requests that discovery be reopened. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff's request to reopen discovery is remanded to the magistrate judge for further consideration.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Upon reconsideration, the Order of the magistrate judge filed March 18, 2022 (ECF No. 126) is AFFIRMED;
2. Plaintiff's Request to Reopen Discovery, made in his Request for Reconsideration, is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further consideration.